Translated automatically from the French version of Kelclinic. Contact us for remarks, questions or help.
russian English French German italian spanish
"For power offensively!"
Author's articles
"For power offensively!"

"For power offensively!"



Previous article: 'Good MI-26, yes dórog " It ended with the words:
"I hope that designers MVZ finally pluck up the courage and obtain patent scheme with the third theater on a wing KB Mil. Mil ".

Vain hope:

"Airbus patented the concept of the helicopter to" at least one elevating motor rotor and bearing at least one pair of wings, at least a pair of horizontal thrust engines, one on the right and left. "
That is, any repeated the scheme, or at least trying to do something with traction motors on the sides, in any arrangement and combination, automatically turns the infringer of the patent watermelon. "

"For power offensively!» 1

But this is a truly Russian scheme established Bratukhina IP even in times of "tsarya- Peas»: Russian Aviation Museum Bratuhin 11-EA 1936.

"For power offensively!» 2

Well, if she peered Airbus better than the general designer of the cost center, they and good luck !!!
Raikin: "Where do you work? - Under construction. - What are you doing? - Yes. " In KB MVZ "Smoke" from the beginning of 80-ies, after the launch of a series of heavyweight Mi-26 under the leadership of MN Tishchenko.

The State Duma was a proposal on restoration of the Ministry of Aviation Industry (MAP). It is logical! Engineering excellence, grow and needs that need to know, understand and meet the holding company "Russian Helicopters". But it must be so, but in fact Holding - a mediator, appropriating, and inhibitory developments helicopter constructors, so the production of helicopter factories. In the Soviet Marie positions occupied by specialists rather than effective managers of sociologists and linguists, specialists of "buy-sell" a trade education on such -Taburetkina Serdyukov.

For example, if the holding company "Russian Helicopters" are not deprived of "Kamov" finance projects Ka-Ka-92 and 102 in 2008godu in favor of virtual Mi-H1, we would today have ended trials of modern high-speed transport helicopters. Syria has shown that in such helicopters in great need of our videoconferencing and the Navy; they need and rebuilding the military towns of the Arctic shelf with flights, etc.

"For power offensively!» 3


But for the maintenance of gas pipelines with frequent landings, oil rigs, to work with an external suspension and fly a short distance, when taking off and landing over 15-30min. flying, high-speed helicopters would not be cost-effective, there is the exactly - helicopters Ka-32-10AG, ie and they will be in demand in the economy, and others.
Also, there is a need for a long time in helicopters at capacity. At one time, NI Kamov Aeroflot offered to replace the Mi-4 helicopter coaxial Ka-25. It had two engines with a total capacity = 1800l.s. (Mi-4 was one motor power = 1700l.s.), Ka-25 at the same duty had much better speed performance and much bólshim power reserve. But, as they say evil tongues, Mil crushed it with his authority and after the withdrawal of the Mi-4 from operating various commissions obletyvayut pipeline and others. Areas on the Mi-8 6-10 number of people, ie, downloading less than half of the possible.

Even against the tail helicopters would like to add that such in-you are very dangerous from the start to the stop screws, so from them for a long time should be abandoned, and freebies for a comfortable life, General Designer MVZ will suffice for a long time, while the Mi-8 yes Mi-24 / 28 not exhausted their resources.
Speaking of MAPE. Soon (maybe sooner) will start serial production of the Mi-38, but the most interesting thing in this moment is that the holding of a series of parallel launches Mi-171A2 factory in Ulan-Ude - a direct competitor to the Mi-38. Mi-171A2 will be cheaper, respectively, and the demand for helicopters Kazan plant, I think, will fall slowly, followed by bankruptcy.

"For power offensively!» 4


Therefore, the management of KHP stóit likely provide such an option, but in its strategy program countermeasures:

  1. fine-tune the production and sale of "ANSAT" helicopters;

  2. reflect on the future replacement of helicopters Mi-8 / 38 on its own initiative, for example on the basis of the same helicopter design vertibirds transverse scheme taking into account the strengths and mistakes Ka-22 and B-12.

I am convinced that the Ka-22 two disasters were subversive, because as it is in the bureau "Kamov" not raped and speed, and accelerations - nothing broke off, did not come off, do not break off, and no accidents. And in the second stretch in both rotary-wing was an attempt to organize the flow of oil, "According to the logbook navigator rotorcraft Ka-22M 01-01 soared in 3 hours 57 minutes, but soon returned due to a fault (leak of oil from beneath the loosely closed oil tank left plug reducer) and 4 10 hours minutes landed. In 4 55 hours minutes and held off repeated after an hour - landing in Turkestan. There was already rotorcraft 01-03 Garnaeva, who before landing in the cabin smoke appeared. On examination discovered unscrewing the nut of the left support shaft synchronization. They saw the car refueled and 01-01. According to the explanation of the mechanics Yu T. Denisova, there has been found and eliminated backlash hinge left slot-machine-warp ". (First flight: 1960).

"For power offensively!» 5

What happens in such cases - motorists know that the engine of the wedge! The number is not passed, because vertibirds flown by pilots of the highest class, then for maintenance after planting was introduced in Turkestan proven defect that prevented then determine the causes of accidents in both cases.

I am sure - if serving tehbrigady were in flight, along with the crews in the rotary-wing, all vertibirds to arrive at your destination without flying accidents!
Just a couple of words on the rotorcraft Ka-22. In describing his cruising speed = 270k / h., But in fact it was more than 300k / h., Its empty weight by nearly half a ton lighter Mi-6 with the same maximum takeoff weight = 42,5t. This means that the motors have the same, and they are built from the same iron, hence the price they are equal, and rotorcraft performance would be much higher!

That's me to the fact that there is a complete sense to repeat the scheme rotorcraft Ka-22 with great benefits for the State and the manufacturer. In addition, NI Kamov built it after the tiny Ka-15, and even KHP "ANSAT" much more, not to mention the serial Mi-8.

"For power offensively!» 6


In tests the speed Ka-22 reached 375k / h. and is powered by a power less than estimated in the 800l.s. and rotor blades obsolete (trapezoid) structure. Excess resistance gave cockpit fuselage built over, but the chassis excessively large value greatly hampered rotorcraft flight, so no doubt that the modern rotorcraft is normal cruising speed in 340-360k / h. and there is no sense to bypass this modern rotorcraft scheme, moreover, it is not so hot as complicated! I would also add that the modern rotorcraft propellers must be made coaxial propfans and safety ground crews and passengers - zakapotirovannye.

Chassis even the high-speed rotary wing can be made non-retractable, but with low drag, keeping in mind that it's not a plane and even take-off it is an aircraft is able to get off the ground at speed = 60k / h.
And for the rear of the truck and shutters - an example of AN-26 / 12.


Vitalii Belyaev.


This question is to determine whether you are a human automated spam submissions.

Bullshit - you can not patent something that has long done. Let the wheel and then just patent

Впервые за долгое время слышу голос здравого смысла по поводу будущности вертикально взлетающих аппаратов.Современное авиастроение зациклилось на примитивной,несовершенной классической схеме "хвостатого" вертолёта.Топчемся на месте вопреки прекрасным разработкам инженеров,к которым справедливо отнесены В-12 и Ка-22.Давно пора разрабатывать современный тяжёлый вертолёт двух- или трёх- винтовой схемы,который даст куда лучшие возможности и по грузоподъёмности,и по скорости.Перспективным представляется и "винтолёт",где используется взаимодействие горизонтального и вертикального винтов.Всё дело в позиции руководства упомянутых в статье ведомств!