Su-35

News

Pilots of F-22 fighters tried to collect data on Su-35

American pilots tried to obtain data on the Su-35 fighter.

Such information was at the disposal of the resource Avia.pro this morning, and according to available data, during the last incident in the skies over Syria, the provocation of American pilots was a carefully planned attempt to study the capabilities of the Russian Su-35 fighter. Nevertheless, it is important to take into account that the American pilots could not obtain any important information, with the exception of visually recorded ones, which is due to a number of factors, however, it is logical to assume that the Pentagon is afraid of Russian aircraft, despite harsh statements about its readiness to shoot them down in the event manifestations of any aggression.

Previous tests showed that the Russian Su-35 fighter could defeat the American F-22 in the event of an air battle, and today, which of course was disputed by representatives of the Pentagon, citing the fact that American fighters are more effective in terms of weapons , and in terms of combat.

Have you ever flown in a fighter ?? I am amazed at the strength of our couch troops! Or maybe you're a rocketeer ??? Most likely, he and the one on the simulators, lying on the couch, with beer! Well: What is the maximum possible angle of attack for the AIM-120C AMRAAM missile, the main one on F-22? Диван продавищь !!!

And it always seemed to me that the missile, by the shortest trajectory, that is, practically, in a straight line, due to a higher constant speed, shortens the distance with the plane and explodes in the immediate vicinity of the aircraft. But, if, as they say, at the last moment, the aircraft sharply changes the flight path to 180 degrees, for example, with a climb, the rocket is unable to change its flight path as rapidly and again "sit" on the tail of the aircraft. Why did the same invented the term "anti-missile maneuver"! I can not imagine a rocket performing aerobatics with a change in not only the direction of movement but also the speed ...

You know, I did not write anything like that, and I understand perfectly well that the pilot wins, but the characteristics of the technology also have a lot of significance ... Yours faithfully Peter ...

What nonsense? Which pilot? So it was 30 years ago. First of all, the quality of technology wins. The ability to be the first to detect and capture the target, which will make it possible to destroy it more safely from a longer distance. And all this is decided not by the pilot, but by the technique. It is not necessary to press the "start" button a lot. I just don't like the fact that ours constantly boast that our aircraft are more maneuverable, but believe me, the rocket absolutely does not care how maneuverable an aircraft is, since its maneuverability characteristics are many times superior to this indicator and never in modern combat an aircraft can escape from a rocket by maneuver will succeed.

The enemy must certainly be destroyed!

Hello!
Quote from your website: "... the Russian Su-35 fighter will be able to defeat the American F-22 in the event of an air battle ..." (end of quote)
I understand patriotism is good! But your hurray-patriotic slogans have already gotten everyone! Is it really incomprehensible that the PILOT wins in an air battle, and not the machine he drives! If you find it difficult to understand, then listen to at least Vysotsky and his song "I - Yak - a fighter!" Thanks. Peter.

I believe our pilots and aviation

Pages

.

Blog and articles

upstairs